Man accused of killing multiple dogs released on a technicality

Man accused of torture and killing of dogs let off on technicality

Charges against a Trenton, Michigan, man, accused of torturing and killing multiple dogs, have been dismissed on a technicality reported Wednesday’s Click On Detroit News. The man who was accused of killing the dogs is identified as 21-year-old Allen Bonds.

Bonds allegedly killed three Yorkshire terriers who belonged to his girlfriend’s mother. He also is accused of breaking into the victimized family’s home and torturing a fourth Yorkshire terrier, who was left with a bloodied nose and an eye injury.

The first two dogs died in the summer of 2014 when Bonds was caring for them – after the death of the first two Yorkshire terriers, the family obtained a third dog named Flanigan. Flanigan had two of his paws broken before someone, allegedly Bonds, broke his neck.

Bonds was arrested at Ferris State University in September 2016 – he faced multiple charges, including animal cruelty and home invasion.

Though the judge dismissed this case, the Wayne County Prosecutor’s office plans to reissue a warrant.

(Photo via Pixabay free images)


Malnourished pit bull, covered in cigarette burns, becomes Firehouse dog – read all about it here.

Screenshot (1275)

35 replies
  1. Debbie hawley says:

    Let’s break the guys hands and since the judge let him go break his to the judge must not be a animal lover

    Reply
  2. Barkley's Mom says:

    What the H*ll was the technicality? More to the point though, after the first two dogs died in his care, why was he ever let near another dog? This is disgusting, he needs to off the streets!

    Reply
  3. Tim Brady says:

    people know where this piece of shit lives, you people who know him need to put on some ski masks a ns pay him a visit and beat himinto a pile of broken scum and then go out and have a stiff drink over it

    Reply
  4. Red says:

    I am so sick of these courts and judges letting these monsters off when they torture, brutalize and KILL defenseless animals…. YORKIES??? REALLY ?? They are maybe 10 pounds soaking wet. This bum needs to Be taught a lesson! However, the judge who lets them off should be held responsible when they finally kill a human because ANIMALS JUST DON’T DO IT ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  5. Kathleen Drude says:

    Are you kidding? The judge a member of this things family? I mean do you need a house to fall on you? This scum broke into their home and injured one and killed another of the Yorkies! I don’t get it!

    Reply
  6. Theresa says:

    That’s fucking bullshit he should have his fucking neck broken what’s wrong with the fucking judge fucking numb nuts

    Reply
  7. maxiemom says:

    Wait a minute…. WHY didn’t the family do anything after the deaths of the first 2 dogs, and why did they give him a chance to do it a third time? This is insane!

    Reply
  8. Sherry says:

    After he kills the first two poor dogs, how in the wold does he get hold of the third one to kill it. I see he breaks in to get access to the fourth. This is crazy. Leave it to our justice system to blow another case for an innocent animal though. Glad to hear he will at least be getting charged with something again. This just sounds like too much of a monster to walk off Scott free.

    Reply
  9. pennysdachshund says:

    Next this wonderful college Psychopath can kill the family who had all their dogs murdered by this psycho bastard… then the Judge can be his next victim… actually the “Nitwit Judge would be deserving of the abuse because of what he let this Piece of Buzzard Vomit get away with!!!

    Reply
  10. mike says:

    I’m curious what the technicality was that caused the dismissal. What the hell was wrong with the family after the first two dogs died that they got another one at the risk of having that asshole around to kill a third dog and abusing a fourth one! He is a serious threat to all animals that crosses his path. He will not stop. He is definitely a serial animal abuser/killer. I’m appalled at the ignorance of this family. They surely must have known and yet they put other dogs in danger after leaving him to care for the first two precious fur babies. I’m shocked just shocked the ignorance of some people who put their pets in danger of someone they knew full well could not be trusted around their dogs. Perhaps I’m rushing to judge the family, but, my conclusions are based from reading both articles.

    Reply
  11. Bunny Peters says:

    SMH: this POS should be locked up FOREVER. He is clearly a danger to people AND animals……

    If he is “in society”, who will he harm next???

    I hope he is locked up soon (& lose the keys)…… it would be great if fellow prisoners “take him out”……. “disposition” of this POS would be a relief for society……… we DON’T need or want him…….

    Reply
  12. Nancy Raymond says:

    Once again, the piss poor judicial system and a judge w/the backbone of overcooked spaghetti come through and allow a maggot like Allen Bonds to continue his abuse of innocent animals. Hopefully, there are some in Trenton Michigan who are incensed as I am and will give this maggot the severe street justice he so well deserves – like a trip through a wood chipper.

    Reply
  13. Gary Guarniere says:

    TWO USELESS POS’S!!! THIS SO CALLED JUDGE SHOULD BE THROWN OFF THE BENCH !!! TECHNICALITY FUCK YOU !!! DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!! HOW CAN YOU LET THIS WORTHLESS POS OFF WITH SO MUCH DAMAGING EVIDENCE!!! ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Reply
    • Derek Dettloff says:

      Evidence? They have none. That’s the point Gary. The mother was under suspicion by the vet FOR YEARS! She accused Allen because she never liked him and made it clear the whole time he was dating her daughter. She was jealous of the time he spent with her daughter. In order to turn the suspicion from herself she accused Allen. The prosecution’s case is half-assed and very sloppy and again short on evidence. They feel their case slipping away and that’s why they notify the media because they are desperate for help. You got a kid who is in college and never been in trouble with anyone ever. To have his future and life ruined because of a vindictive jealous mother is just not right.

      Reply
      • tina says:

        Then who the 2 dogs killed under his care? Being a college kid who’s never been in trouble doesn’t mean he didn’t kill the dogs. Please give us details why the mom was under suspicion by the vets. Enlighten us to prove his innocence. Too many circumstances with the dogs death pertaining to your friend is too much to ignore. The mom may have hated him perhaps knowing this he retaliated by killing their dogs! Friends are not always as they seem.

      • tina says:

        Then enlighten us about the mom’s suspicion by the vet. Who did kill the 2 dogs under his care? So what a college kid who’s never been in trouble doesn’t mean HE DIDN’T kill the dogs.

  14. Derek Dettloff says:

    All you people calling for blood and revenge and all this crap….you don’t know Allen obviously. And the technicality was basically poor procedure and preparation by the prosecution. The case has been sloppy based on all circumstantial evidence from the very beginning. You all need to get your facts straight and actually learn something about the case instead of believing The Sensational articles put out by the media. And for those of you threatening my friend, you better be very careful. He has people who know him, love him and will protect him.

    Reply
    • Helen says:

      Obviously you don’t know him!!!! Too many circumstances show he did something to those dogs. Technicality does not mean it was the poor procedure and preparation by the prosecutor. Something was brought to the attention to the judge to call technicality. If you know so much what was the technicality. In specific words share it!!!!

      Reply
      • Barkley's Mom says:

        I would be happy to and learn all about your UPSTANDING “friend”. Unfortunately I live too far away I’m sure he is SO lucky to have you in his corner defending his right to kill people’s dogs! I might add, if you have any pets it might be prudent to keep them away from your “good friend”!

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *